Skip Navigation

9881 Broken Land Parkway
Suite 100
Columbia, MD 21046

P. 410-290-0707

__________

111 South Calvert Street

Suite 2700

Baltimore, MD 21202

P. 410-962-1199

__________

Damages recoverable in summary ejectment

Summary Ejectment: Court of Appeals Limits Recoveries for Landlords

In the event of non-payment of rent or other material default, landlords are entitled to summary proceedings to obtain possession of the property.  In addition, a request can be made for a monetary judgment for outstanding rent as of the date of the hearing, provided appropriate service of process has been made.  When seeking money judgments in such proceedings, landlords routinely request attorneys' fees and other costs cast as "additional rent" when seeking possession of premises in the event of default.

On June 29, 2006, Maryland's Court of Special Appeals in Law Offices of Taiwo Agbaje, P.C. v. JLH Properties, II, LLC,  issued an opinion holding that a landlord could not recover attorneys fees as additional rent in a summary ejectment action.  

The Court relied on the decision of the Court of Appeals in Shum v. Gaudreau, 317 Md. 49 (1989), noting that "generally, contract damages could not be sought in an...ejectment proceeding." Opinion at p. 15.  In summary ejectment "'rent' is not defined by statute, but is generally defined as "payment for the tenant's use, possession and enjoyment of land."  Opinion at p. 13 citing Shum at p. 65.   Applying this principle, the Court noted that attorneys' fees, while recoverable under a contract theory, were not recoverable in summary ejectment. Contract damages would be "such a complex factual inquiry" as to "frustrate the expedited design of the summary ejectment statue."  Opinion at p. 16.

Contrarily, the Court did hold that the tenant was within its rights to raise and litigate an abatement of rent argument contractually provided for in the lease.    "[W]here a lease provides for an abatement of rent, the tenant may assert the abatement provision in an ejectment proceeding instituted".  Opinion at p. 25.  The Court rationalized that the refusal to allow such a defense would create unnecessary litigation. 

  

  


BTLG Attorneys At Law

Talk to a lawyer

Bold labels are required.

News from BTLG:

Retirement Can Cause A Member to Involuntarily Withdraw From an LLC
A provision in a limited liability company Operating Agreement stating that a member’s termination of employment shall be an involuntary withdrawal of a member may also include the situation where a member retires from the company.
Maryland Parental Leave Act
The Maryland Parental Leave Act provides eligible employees with the right to take up to six (6) weeks of unpaid paternal leave during any twelve (12) month period
Recovery of Overtime Wages Subject to Enhanced Damages under Maryland Wage Payment and Collection Law
In the case of Peters v. Early Healthcare Giver, Inc. the Court of Appeals of Maryland determined that overtime wages are recoverable both under the Maryland Wage and Hour Law (“MWHL”) and the Maryland Wage Payment and Collection Law (“MWPCL”)
Employment agreements: for-cause termination provisions versus at-will employment
A for-cause termination provision can turn, what the parties intended to be at-will employment, in to perpetual employment subject only to termination for-cause.
More BTLG News